<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Love Shack &#187; OpenID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-love-shack.net/category/openid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net</link>
	<description>Yes, the B-52&#039;s. No, not pr0n. Sheesh!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Simplifying IM</title>
		<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/07/10/simplifying-im/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/07/10/simplifying-im/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/07/10/simplifying-im/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I currently have 5 different Instant Messaging accounts. ICQ, AOL IM (AIM), Yahoo!, MSN, and Google Talk. Aside from the obvious hassle of remembering 5 different names and passwords for 5 different services (hmm, wouldn&#8217;t OpenID be a great solution here?) I also have to deal with finding a way to connect to all of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently have 5 different Instant Messaging accounts. <a href="http://www.icq.com">ICQ</a>, <a href="http://www.aim.com">AOL IM (AIM)</a>, <a href="http://messenger.yahoo.com">Yahoo!</a>, <a href="http://messenger.msn.com">MSN</a>, and <a href="http://talk.google.com">Google Talk</a>. Aside from the obvious hassle of remembering 5 different names and passwords for 5 different services (hmm, wouldn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.openid.net">OpenID</a> be a great solution here?) I also have to deal with finding a way to connect to all of those services as well as trying to find some way to manage my chat logs so that I can actually find stuff when I need it. Thankfully, people realized that having 5 different messaging clients is a pain, so we now have all-in-one solutions like <a href="http://www.pidgin.im">Pidgin</a> and <a href="http://www.ceruleanstudios.com">Trillian</a> that make this much simpler. And, if you&#8217;re traveling, there are excellent services like <a href="http://www.meebo.com">Meebo</a> that allow you to chat from anywhere using just a web browser.</p>
<p>But, and this is a big one, with all of these various ways to access our IM networks now, we&#8217;re leaving chat logs scattered everywhere with no way to effectively find stuff we need. Not only do you have to remember WHO you talked to, WHEN you talked to them, and WHICH network they were on, but you ALSO have to remember HOW you accessed that network so that you can find the log! It&#8217;s enough to drive a normal person insane! But, thankfully, it doesn&#8217;t have to be like that. I&#8217;ve spent the last 3 days pounding my head against my keyboard to finally come up with a solution that I find almost perfect (of course, YMMV).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a big fan of <a href="http://www.gmail.com">Gmail</a> for a while, and when they added Google Talk functionality right into the contact list I actually started using it. Shortly after that I started using an actual chat client to connect since having to use the web interface all the time drives me nuts. Then I noticed something cool. Gtalk not only logs your chats when you&#8217;re on gmail.com, it logs your chats no matter where you are! Now, privacy concerns aside, this was great news. I could chat from anywhere, using any client, and still access my entire chat history on Gmail. This was a fantastic feature! Unfortunately, out of 140+ IM contacts, 2 were on Google Talk&#8230; so this wasn&#8217;t all that great after all&#8230;</p>
<p>But wait! Google Talk uses the Jabber protocol&#8230; and Jabber allows IM gateways to other networks&#8230; hmm&#8230; I wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>So I present to you my Unified Messaging Platform&trade;&copy;&reg;&infin;! You take one serving of GTalk, sprinkle in some Jabber-y goodness, fold in a handful of Jabber-to-<i>other IM network</i> gateways, bake for 35 minutes and voilà, pure messaging satisfaction!</p>
<p>I now use any chat client I want (including the Gmail web interface) and see all of my contacts from ICQ, AIM, Yahoo, and MSN. I can talk to anyone on any network and, as far as they can tell, it&#8217;s still my same old username. But, in fact, my chats are being logged to my gmail account so I can always find them when I need them.</p>
<p>Now all of this talk is just fine, but it doesn&#8217;t help anyone but me, right? Well, in short order, I will be unveiling the grand design to allow anyone to simplify their messaging. But it&#8217;s definitely not going to fit into a single blog post so it&#8217;ll be an actual guide under &#8220;Geek Pages&#8221;. (Look to your right.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/07/10/simplifying-im/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoom, Zooom, Zooomr!</title>
		<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/25/zoom-zooom-zooomr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/25/zoom-zooom-zooomr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/25/zoom-zooom-zooomr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still hate Comcast, but at least I can get some decent speed out of them every once in a while&#8230;

Photo hosted courtesy of Zooomr. It&#8217;s like Flickr, only better because they use OpenID.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still hate Comcast, but at least I can get some decent speed out of them every once in a while&#8230;</p>
<div style="width:240px;text-align:right;"><a href="http://beta.zooomr.com/photos/alexm/762427/" title="Zooomr Photo Sharing :: Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.zooomr.com/images/762427_496150ec6b_m.jpg" width="240" height="230" alt="Screenshot" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>Photo hosted courtesy of <a href="http://beta.zooomr.com">Zooomr</a>. It&#8217;s like Flickr, only better because they use <a href="http://openid.net">OpenID</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/25/zoom-zooom-zooomr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too many Chiefs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/12/too-many-chiefs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/12/too-many-chiefs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 07:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/12/too-many-chiefs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not enough Indians&#8230; in a nutshell, that&#8217;s the problem with OpenID today. Everybody and their mother wants to be an OpenID provider. Technorati, LiveJournal, TypeKey, and plenty of others. And that&#8217;s fine. Variety is good; decentralized is good. But&#8230; and this is a big one (no pun intended   )&#8230; having a dozen different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not enough Indians&#8230; in a nutshell, that&#8217;s the problem with <a href="http://openid.net">OpenID</a> today. Everybody and their mother wants to be an OpenID provider. Technorati, LiveJournal, TypeKey, and <strong>plenty</strong> of others. And that&#8217;s fine. Variety is good; decentralized is good. <strong>But</strong>&#8230; and this is a big one (no pun intended <img src='http://www.the-love-shack.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )&#8230; having a dozen different OpenID&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t do me a damned bit of good if there are no places to log into with them.</p>
<p>Now I can understand someone like <a href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> not getting on the bandwagon just yet. They&#8217;re a huge entity and they need lots of time and manpower to make that big of a leap. While having them onboard would be a <strong>huge</strong> boost, I don&#8217;t expect them to hop on just yet. However, one of the things that I <strong>do</strong> expect is that all of these sites that are offering me an OpenID allow me to actually&#8230; oh I don&#8217;t know&#8230; maybe <strong>log in with one</strong>?!?!</p>
<p>I <strong>have</strong> an OpenID. I want to go to Technorati and <strong>log in</strong> with my OpenID. That&#8217;s the whole point, right? To make things easier for the end user?! I&#8217;d like to go to LiveJournal and tell them which OpenID I want to have associated with my journal so that I can log in with it. &#8220;No sorry, we can&#8217;t do that for you&#8230; but&#8230; would you like an OpenID?&#8221; <strong>No! I don&#8217;t want another stinking OpenID!</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m extremely thankful that there are great sites like <a href="http://beta.zooomr.com">Zooomr</a> out there where I can actually use my OpenID and get on with my business. And there are lots of great contributions to the community in the form of plugins. Evan Prodromou has written an excellent <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org">MediaWiki</a> <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID">extension</a>, Hans Granqvist wrote an excellent <a href="http://www.wordpress.org">WordPress</a> <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/wpopenid">plugin</a> (that I personally use here at The Love Shack), and there are plenty of <a href="http://www.openidenabled.com/software">others</a> contributing to the community as well. Not to mention all of the people who are using the above projects to allow people to more easily log in to sites; using OpenID the way it was intended.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m genuinely concerned that if this trend of companies only being providers doesn&#8217;t change, OpenID will end up just being another one of those great ideas that never quite caught on. Thankfully, other people are noticing this as well. Conor over at <a href="http://www.argolon.com">Argolon</a> put up a great entry about <a href="http://www.argolon.com/2007/02/07/openid-i-want-to-love-it-but">this problem</a>.</p>
<p>So what can we actually do to change this? Honestly, I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m open to suggestions. I&#8217;m hoping that my little commentary on it in this little obscure corner of the web will maybe help. I&#8217;ve expressed my disappointment to all of the aforementioned Chiefs whenever possible. I&#8217;ve also done what little I can to not support them by intentionally not linking to them. Not that that&#8217;s going to help that much, but hey. It&#8217;s my little form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_resistance">passive resistance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/12/too-many-chiefs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Useless OpenID uses&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/11/useless-openid-uses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/11/useless-openid-uses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-love-shack.net/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m really happy to be seeing a lot more sites out there using OpenID. It&#8217;s great that there are lots of people really embracing the concept. What&#8217;s really getting on my nerves, is the half-a$$ed implementations of OpenID I&#8217;m seeing out there.
LiveJournal, the place where OpenID was born still won&#8217;t allow you to actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m really happy to be seeing a lot more sites out there using <a href="http://openid.net">OpenID</a>. It&#8217;s great that there are lots of people really embracing the concept. What&#8217;s really getting on my nerves, is the half-a$$ed implementations of OpenID I&#8217;m seeing out there.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livejournal.com">LiveJournal</a>, the place where OpenID was born still won&#8217;t allow you to actually LOG IN with an OpenID. <strong>But</strong>, they&#8217;ll gladly give you a free OpenID to use as you see fit&#8230; since, of course, it&#8217;s much easier to remember someguy019287439632.livejournal.com instead of myrealname.myopenid.com or something else equally weird, right? Yes, thank you LJ, for your wonderful contributions to the OpenID community.</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s not forget the wonderful folks over at <a href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a>. They had a great big <a href="http://technorati.com/weblog/2006/10/144.html">announcement</a> a little while ago talking about how they&#8217;re going to so graciously support poor little OpenID. Turns out they&#8217;re nice enough to allow you to claim your blog using OpenID. So now that I can have a single login for all sites, here&#8217;s how using my OpenID with Technorati will work:</p>
<ul>
<ol>
<li>Go to technorati and find my blog</li>
<li>Select &#8220;Claim this blog&#8221;</li>
<li>Log in with my OpenI&#8230; err&#8230; hmm&#8230; I can&#8217;t actually LOG IN with my OpenID? Ok&#8230;</li>
<li>So&#8230; create a new user account with Technorati?</li>
<li>Pick yet another random username to use</li>
<li>Pick yet another random password, that I&#8217;ll probably forget in 20 minutes</li>
<li>Log in and select &#8220;Use OpenID Claim&#8221;</li>
<li>Wait&#8230; Use OpenID Claim isn&#8217;t there&#8230; hmm&#8230; ok&#8230;</li>
<li>Maybe it doesn&#8217;t like my OpenID Wordpress plugin&#8230; I know, I&#8217;ll try my LiveJournal, like in the example&#8230;</li>
<li>I&#8217;ll just type that in, hit claim blog and&#8230;</li>
<li>Nothing&#8230;</li>
<li>Storm away in disgust and write an angry blog-post about it&#8230;</li>
</ol>
</ul>
<p>Yes, thank you Technorati. Your OpenID support has really made my surfing experience so much more pleasant&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/11/useless-openid-uses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More OpenID&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/09/more-openid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/09/more-openid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Network Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-love-shack.net/index.php/2007/02/09/more-openid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I get into the whole OpenID the more I like it. Unfortunately, the more I get into it the more I hate not having it. For example, I just saw a great post on Simon Richter&#8217;s blog that I was going to comment on. So I go to post my comment, and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I get into the whole <a href="http://www.openid.net">OpenID</a> the more I like it. Unfortunately, the more I get into it the more I hate not having it. For example, I just saw a great post on <a href="http://www.hogyros.de">Simon Richter&#8217;s blog</a> that I was going to comment on. So I go to post my comment, and I can&#8217;t. Only registered users.</p>
<p>Ok, no problem, I&#8217;ll just log in really quick and then do my comment. At least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve gotten spoiled with on the handful of sites that use OpenID. Sadly, the rest of the web doesn&#8217;t quite work like that&#8230;</p>
<p>Instead, I had to create a new username and wait for my activation email to come in. After it came in, it gave me a temporary password to use. So I went back to the site, logged in using my temporary password and then had to edit my account settings to set a more convenient password. After all of that, I can finally post a comment. Except that, now, I don&#8217;t really feel like posting a comment anymore. I&#8217;ve moved on to better things, like <a href="http://beta.zooomr.com/home">Zooomr</a>, for example, which <b>does</b> support OpenID.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really intended to pick on Simon in particular. Much like 95% of the rest of the web, his blog just hasn&#8217;t gotten onto the OpenID bandwagon just yet. Though since it is powered by <a href="http://www.drupal.org">Drupal</a>, it seems like a great candidate for the <a href="http://www.openidenabled.com/software/drupal/openid-module/view">OpenID plugin for Drupal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.the-love-shack.net/2007/02/09/more-openid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
